00-11-28
.....
The Fire Group meeting started this
morning, with people in from Boeing,
Swissair, FAA, NTSB, and others, as
well as many of the TSB members.
Also present was the film crew and
Howard GREEN, shooting the
documentary for the Nature of
Things, who sat in on the meeting
all day. I had asked John
GARSTANG a week ago about attending,
and he hesitated, saying that he
would have to clear it with Vic
GERDEN, even though I am a member of
the Fire Group. However, over
the past several days, it was subtly
made clear to me that I would not be
allowed to attend the meeting.
This is likely in part because of
the recent report on the insulation
and end cap burns, and the fact that
I would not agree to not reporting
on anything that I see or hear.
So, what is there to see that
shouldn’t be seen by me? I did
have a chance to speak with Pat
CAHILL of the FAA, who is in
attendance. She said that she
was very impressed with the
presentation. During the
conversation, I mentioned magnesium,
and she responded by saying that she
had heard nothing on the subject in
nearly a year (this isn’t exactly
correct as we had spoken about it
when she had asked on 00-08-25), and
what had become of it. I
explained that the source was still
unknown, and she wondered why
nothing had been said. I
suggested that this is not in the
area of the TSB because it implies a
criminal act. She also advised
that she had worked on an arson file
at Montreal Airport back about 1995
in which someone had set up an arson
device in the overhead baggage rack
of a North West Airlines plane.
She couldn’t remember all the
details and said that she would get
me a copy of the data. During
the conversation, I also mentioned
the recent tests at her lab with
John GARSTANG. I asked how the
items could have passed the original
tests, and she said that the tests
were designed differently now, and
the original tests did not reflect
what we now know about incidents
like this. I took it that they
had to start somewhere and now they
have improved the testing. But
it also seems that in setting up the
original guidelines, tests would
have had to be conducted to
determine those guidelines.
There would seem to be a
considerable amount of latitude and
subjectivity in such actions.
Our experience is that if you apply
a match to Metallized Mylar when
crumpled in a ball, it will quickly
consume itself in flame. But
this was not the original test and
they must have determined for some
reason that this would not be part
of that test. It certainly
makes one wonder how and who came to
those original guidelines.