00-07-14
0700 Morning routine.
..
I received a table from Gus that lists the major
alloying elements wt %, balance Al. It
gives the weight percentages of elements present
in each of the aluminium alloy types, with the
remainder being aluminium. Add up the
listed percentages, and 100 less that amount is
the percentage weight of aluminium. It can
be seen that the amounts are relatively
flexible, but all within one percentage in the
case of copper, and much less for the other
elements. The maximum amount of magnesium
present is in the 7075-type alloy and that only
reaches 2.9 percent. The frame pieces are
7075 type alloy, and these would have all been
covered by insulation material prior to the
fire.
MAJOR ALLOYING ELEMENTS WT%,
BALANCE AL
|
ALLOY
|
2024
|
6061
|
7075
|
Cu
|
3.8 4.9
|
0.15
0.4
|
1.2 2.0
|
Zn
|
0.25 Max
|
0.25 max
|
5.1 6.1
|
Mg
|
1.2 1.8
|
0.8 1.2
|
2.1 2.9
|
Mn
|
0.3 0.9
|
0.15 max
|
0.3 max
|
Si
|
0.5 max
|
0.4 0.8
|
0.4 max
|
Fe
|
0.5 max
|
0.7 max
|
0.5 max
|
Cr
|
0.1 max
|
0.04
0.35
|
0.18
0.28
|
(Clarification:) In order for the
metal to have been the source of the elements in
the beads, the metal would have had to have
burnt to release the elements. This would
have required extremely high temperatures that
would have melted the aluminium skin. That
did not happen. Plus, the question would
be what would have caused
those extremely high temperatures?
With Vic GORMAN this morning, had a discussion
with Gus SIDLA over the Sky Scan. SIDLA
again explained the Sectioning method and stated
that it involved the grinding off of successive
layers of the bead, finally leaving it only as a
pile of grindings in the sink. Vic finally
said that he agreed with performing the tests
(Sky Scan) and that he would recommend it to
Insp. LATHEM. SIDLA stated that GERDEN is
being non-committal about the test.
..
Vic GORMAN and Neil FRASER came in this morning
to do an inventory check, and Linda GRAY was
with them to do the paperwork. It lasted
part of the morning and all afternoon.
They went over everything, checking numbers on
every item and even went through all of my
unlocked desk drawers and lockers. We
havent done that on Ident Sections for many
years. It seems rather strange that he
would be checking the numbers on the very
cameras that he himself had been using, as if I
would want to alter them. We ended up in a
very loud and strong disagreement over
equipment, particularly what I use regularly and
still have a need for. This included the
digital video camera and the video-editing
suite. The suite ended up going back to
the lab, even though I have numerous tapes to be
copied to VHS. These tapes include the
various trip tapes and the seawater test
footage, plus some taken here in the hangar,
both in digital and Hi8. In total, it is
over a dozen tapes. This was explained but
was not accepted. I was accused of hoarding
equipment, whatever that means! There was
no prior discussion of the matter; the equipment
was just pulled, as if he was fulfilling an
agenda. I had to retrieve the digital
video camera and a quartz light from the pile.
This camera is my only means of playing the
digital tapes, and they have to be downloaded to
the computer. One of the still frame
digital cameras was taken for Coastal Watch,
even though the camera is not suitable for
outdoor photography in a wet sea spray
environment. As far as hoarding, that is
strange as I only just received the editing
suite from the back room where Helene has spent
the past year copying tapes. Once again,
it shows a lack of knowledge of what is going on
here in the Hangar. It really makes one
wonder, especially since my reports have had to
route through him to reach Insp. LATHEM!
So why did he present himself to undertake the
inventory audit in this manner? I suspect
that he thinks he is reflecting the attitude of
upper management. His comment was that the
file is over and there is only housekeeping
left. Taking away the equipment is one
sure way of telling me this and its an attempt
to warn me off, even though we have an
outstanding issue regarding the very cause of
the fire that started this file. GORMAN
and I have had some discussions over this
subject, and we seldom have ever agreed. I
take his actions as an attempt to tell me to
back off from the file, that it is over, and
that nothing more is to be done on it. I
think that he certainly feels he reflects the
thoughts of management, and I suspect that he
does indeed reflect their feelings. This
file is no longer the source of accolades, but
instead is a burden to management. Tall
ships are now in the limelight and they take
priority over this file.
..