00-05-08
. . . .
Forwarded a memo to Andy
LATHEM (Vic GORMAN later advised that he
received it from LATHEM – see below why) that is
actually a memo to Vic GERDEN asking for a
meeting – as follows:
(CLARIFICATION)
It turned out that this memo created
considerable annoyance (putting it mildly) with
Lathem and Gorman because they claimed that it
had not gone through the proper channels.
The process was that I was to give my
correspondence to Gorman who then would have
added his comments or, as in this case,
generated an additional memo. He then
would have passed it on to Lathem. Since
they were both in the same office with desks
only a few feet apart, and Gorman was frequently
elsewhere other than in the hangar, I didn't see
it as much of a problem. What’s more, the
memo had been handed to Lathem’s secretary, who
I then expected would put it in Gorman’s
in-basket. It seems she didn’t, and
possibly I should have been more explicit with
my instructions to her. Nonetheless, the
higher up the rank ladder, the more important
becomes the paper trail as, after all, that’s
how they justify their existence on the payroll.
My memo called for a meeting with the TSB
(Gerden and Sidla, and hopefully Garstang) to
discuss the further examination of the wire
beads. The TSB's normal process was to
grind them to nothing while periodically
examining them under a high-powered microscope.
It would have resulted in the beads being
totally destroyed. Dr. Brown had an
alternative method that would leave the beads
intact for future examination by other methods
and for court. This was important because
I believed the cause of the fire to have been a
criminal act which hopefully would have resulted
in a suspect being charged with the potential
for criminal court.
However, even though Gorman appeared to
support the suggestion of an Ottawa meeting that
included Dr. Brown, one can see in the hindsight
of the big picture that Lathem was against it.
Plus, it appears that the bead destruction was
solely my concern and not that of Lathem's. At the time I had no idea what his motives were,
but it is now obvious that he did not want Dr.
Brown present in any meeting. What's more,
before drafting his memo, he would have
consulted with Vic Gerden as his memo is dated
the 15th, and the very next day there is a
meeting with all the TSB members briefed and
ready just as Gerden suddenly appears in the
hangar. It though was obvious that neither
Gerden nor Lathem wanted to sit down in the same
room with Dr. Brown as they would have learned
of his opinion that there had been a criminal
device onboard that aircraft. What's more,
his evidence and presentation would have been
most persuasive. That would have required
a complete and full criminal investigation which
would have brought in the FBI, and out the
hangar door would have gone the TSB. They
would then have lost their honeypot of a file
and all its ensuing glory.
A meeting was quickly arranged and held in
the hangar on the 16th
May. Lathem and Gorman were be present
along with Foot, and it was another debacle
controlled by Gerden and Lathem without any
expert opinion of either Dr. Brown or John
Garstang.